Two more rent-overcharge lawsuits get class-action status

Scharfman, Chestnut Holdings targeted for taking J-51 benefits

New York /
Jan.January 15, 2020 07:00 AM
250 Fort Washington Ave and 310 Convent Avenue with Housing Rights Initiative’s Aaron Carr (Credit: iStock, Facebook, Google Maps)

250 Fort Washington Avenue and 310 Convent Avenue with Housing Rights Initiative’s Aaron Carr (Credit: iStock, Facebook, Google Maps)

As the future of rent overcharge cases hangs in the balance, two major rent-overcharge cases have attained class certification.

A lawsuit alleging that landlord The Scharfman Organization overcharged tenants while receiving J-51 tax benefits at a Washington Heights building received class certification last week.

Four days later, a similar case alleging that landlord Chestnut Holdings overcharged two tenants and possibly more than a hundred others at a Hamilton Heights building also received class certification.

The two lawsuits were brought by the tenant-advocate group Housing Rights Initiative. Aaron Carr, executive director and founder of HRI, said the class certifications in the two cases “couldn’t come at a better time.”

“Whether the fight is in court or in Albany, it’s a fight for affordability,” Carr said.

His group has pursued many such cases in recent years after a pivotal Court of Appeals ruling found that landlords receiving J-51 tax benefits cannot deregulate an apartment when the legal passed a certain threshold and the unit was vacant or occupied by high-income tenants. The 2009 decision allowed the state to calculate rent overcharge amounts based on the most recent legal regulated rent, even if a significant period of time had elapsed.

The expanded look-back period and increased potential damages under the Housing and Stability Tenant Protection Act of 2019 has led to a flurry of new cases. The Court of Appeals is set to decide whether the new rent law will be applied to pending cases. This month it heard blistering arguments from landlord and tenant attorneys.

William Hummell, the attorney who represents Chestnut Holdings, said he had hoped the judge would grant his motion to dismiss the case, “but the laws changed.” The units’ rents were raised under luxury deregulation, according to Hummel, which was appropriate for the three- to four-bedroom dwellings.

“These were substantial apartments, which is not really typical,” Hummel said. “They were deregulated because the rents had been very high due to so many bedrooms in a unit.”

Grimble and LoGuidice is the law firm representing the plaintiffs at 250 Fort Washington. The attorney for the plaintiffs at 310 Convent Avenue, Lucas Ferrara, said he “cries not” for those who took calculated risks and lost.

“Maybe … they should ensure that their real-estate holding companies adhere to the requirements of the law, rather than skirting the rent regulations, and taking advantage of a lack of government oversight, all at the expense of their regulated tenants,” Ferrara said.

Landlord attorneys have argued that before the courts decided the matter it had been far from clear that properties receiving J-51 benefits had to offer all tenants rent-regulated leases.

Luxury deregulation was one of several options previously available to landlords seeking to take apartments out of rent stabilization before the state legislature’s drastic overhaul of the rent rules.

The attorney representing The Scharfman Organization declined to comment.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Vanke US managing director Kai-yan Lee, RFR’s Aby Rosen and 100 East 53rd Street (Photos via Foster + Partners and Getty)

Vanke seeks to remove RFR from Midtown condo project

Vanke seeks to remove RFR from Midtown condo project
Emerald Equity’s Isaac Kassirer  with 110 West 116th Street and 120 West 116th Street (Google Maps; Emerald)

Ladder Capital moves to foreclose on Emerald Equity’s Harlem rentals

Ladder Capital moves to foreclose on Emerald Equity’s Harlem rentals
Magnum Real Estate's Ben Shaoul and 87 Leonard Street (Getty; StreetEasy)

Tribeca condo owners sue Magnum Real Estate, seeking $7.6M

Tribeca condo owners sue Magnum Real Estate, seeking $7.6M
From left: Ben Ashkenazy, 1991 Broadway, 2067 Broadway and Samuel Gindi (Getty; Google Maps)

Billionaire developer Ben Ashkenazy in feud with investor over reputation, cash

Billionaire developer Ben Ashkenazy in feud with investor over reputation, cash
Chestnut Holdings president Jonathan Wiener (Photos via iStock; The Westchester Bank)

State investigation takes issue with faulty lease riders

State investigation takes issue with faulty lease riders
New York Wheel (S9 Architecture|Perkins Eastman; Pixabay)

Going in circles: Dueling New York Wheel lawsuits emerge

Going in circles: Dueling New York Wheel lawsuits emerge
State Sen. Michael Gianaris and President-elect Joe Biden (Getty)

Michael Gianaris to President-elect Biden: Cancel rent

Michael Gianaris to President-elect Biden: Cancel rent
HFZ's Ziel Feldman and CIM's Shaul Kuba (Getty, iStock)

HFZ sues CIM to halt condo foreclosure sale

HFZ sues CIM to halt condo foreclosure sale
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...