Two more rent-overcharge lawsuits get class-action status

Scharfman, Chestnut Holdings targeted for taking J-51 benefits

TRD New York /
Jan.January 15, 2020 07:00 AM
250 Fort Washington Ave and 310 Convent Avenue with Housing Rights Initiative’s Aaron Carr (Credit: iStock, Facebook, Google Maps)

250 Fort Washington Ave and 310 Convent Avenue with Housing Rights Initiative’s Aaron Carr (Credit: iStock, Facebook, Google Maps)

As the future of rent overcharge cases hangs in the balance, two major rent-overcharge cases have attained class certification.

A lawsuit alleging that landlord The Scharfman Organization overcharged tenants while receiving J-51 tax benefits at a Washington Heights building received class certification last week.

Four days later, a similar case alleging that landlord Chestnut Holdings overcharged more than a hundred tenants at a Hamilton Heights building also received class certification.

The two lawsuits were brought by the tenant-advocate group Housing Rights Initiative. Aaron Carr, executive director and founder of HRI, said the class certifications in the two cases “couldn’t come at a better time.”

“Whether the fight is in court or in Albany, it’s a fight for affordability,” Carr said.

His group has pursued many such cases in recent years after a pivotal Court of Appeals ruling found that landlords receiving J-51 tax benefits cannot deregulate an apartment when the legal passed a certain threshold and the unit was vacant or occupied by high-income tenants. The 2009 decision allowed the state to calculate rent overcharge amounts based on the most recent legal regulated rent, even if a significant period of time had elapsed.

The expanded look-back period and increased potential damages under the Housing and Stability Tenant Protection Act of 2019 has led to a flurry of new cases. The Court of Appeals is set to decide whether the new rent law will be applied to pending cases. This month it heard blistering arguments from landlord and tenant attorneys.

William Hummell, the attorney who represents Chestnut Holdings, said he had hoped the judge would grant his motion to dismiss the case, “but the laws changed.” The units’ rents were raised under luxury deregulation, according to Hummel, which was appropriate for the three- to four-bedroom dwellings.

“These were substantial apartments, which is not really typical,” Hummel said. “They were deregulated because the rents had been very high due to so many bedrooms in a unit.”

Grimble and LoGuidice is the attorney for the plaintiffs at 250 Fort Washington. The attorney for the plaintiffs at 310 Convent Avenue, Lucas Ferrara, said he “cries not” for those who took calculated risks and lost.

“Maybe … they should ensure that their real-estate holding companies adhere to the requirements of the law, rather than skirting the rent regulations, and taking advantage of a lack of government oversight, all at the expense of their regulated tenants,” Ferrara said.

Landlord attorneys have argued that before the courts decided the matter it had been far from clear that properties receiving J-51 benefits had to offer all tenants rent-regulated leases.

Luxury deregulation was one of several options previously available to landlords seeking to take apartments out of rent stabilization before the state legislature’s drastic overhaul of the rent rules.

The attorney representing The Scharfman Organization declined to comment.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Harvey HHernandez (Credit: Airbnb)

Airbnb sues Miami partner in branded apartments concept

Book Culture at 450 Columbus Avenue (Credit: Google Maps)

Upper West Side bookstore closes amid accusations of fraud

Firefighters work to extinguish a fire as a building burns after an explosion on 2nd Avenue in March 26, 2015 (Credit: Getty Images)

$24K in rent set in motion the fatal 2015 East Village blast. Prison now looms for the landlord and contractors

Harry and Linda Macklowe (Credit: Getty Images, iStock)

The Macklowes’ massive art collection nears auction

Heritage Equity Partners Toby Moskovits and Michael Lichtenstein

Lawsuit: Toby Moskovits, Michael Lichtenstein owe investor $3M

Clipper Equity's David Bistricer (inset) and the US Supreme Court (Credit: RealInsight and Getty Images)

US Supreme Court denies Clipper’s rent regulation petition

1074 Eastern Parkway in Brooklyn (Credit: Google Maps)

Crown Heights tenants sue infamous landlord for rent overcharges

Rent overcharge claims against landlords are on the rise (Credit: iStock)

Rent overcharge cases pile up

arrow_forward_ios
Loading...