Cuomo veto spares condos, co-ops from paying prevailing wage

Bill would have stripped tax break from larger buildings

New York /
Feb.February 13, 2020 06:00 PM
Governor Andrew Cuomo and a SEIU 32BJ rally in October (Credit: Getty Images, SEIU 32BJ)

Governor Andrew Cuomo and a SEIU 32BJ rally in October (Credit: Getty Images, SEIU 32BJ)

The real estate industry just scored a quiet victory in Albany.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo pocket-vetoed a bill that would strip a popular property tax abatement from condominium and cooperative homeowners in larger buildings that failed to pay building service workers prevailing wage.

The legislation, which was backed by building service workers union 32BJ SEIU, was not delivered to the governor’s desk until Dec. 30, and therefore died when he failed to sign it within 30 days.

The bill targeted buildings where units’ average assessed value exceeded $60,000. It would have made them ineligible for a 17.5 percent reduction on their annual property tax bill unless they certified in an affidavit that doormen and other such employees working at least eight hours a month were paid prevailing wage. Less valuable buildings were exempted.

Of the 620,146 co-op and condo units in the city, 303,037 receive the abatement, according to the Department of Finance. A breakdown by assessed value was not available.

The sponsor of the bill in the Senate, as it happens, hails from the real estate industry: Manhattan Democrat Brian Benjamin. Before his election in 2017, he was a managing director at Genesis Companies. He did not respond to requests for comment.

Real estate interests opposed the bill, arguing that smaller condos and co-ops could struggle to pay prevailing wage, which can be several times higher than what would be paid without such a mandate.

“It doesn’t surprise me that the governor didn’t sign it,” said Erica Buckley, partner of Nixon Peabody’s co-operatives and condominium practice. “We want to take care of workers but it really shouldn’t be at the expense of smaller condos or co-ops.”

Attorney Leni Morrison Cummins said the bill had “very deeply concerned” co-op and condo boards, which felt that by either committing to pay prevailing wage, or forgoing the abatement, could hit homeowners’ wallets. She called Cuomo’s veto “a huge victory.”

Other lawyers disagree. Stuart Saft, a partner at Holland & Knight, said “it’s really meaningless because most condos and co-ops weren’t going to be affected,” given that workers at the larger, wealthier buildings tend to be unionized and are paid prevailing wage. Saft is the chairman of the Council of New York Cooperatives and Condominiums, which lobbied against the bill last year and represents around 1,000 condo and coop buildings throughout the city.

But the bill was certainly important to 32BJ, one of the country’s largest property-service workers unions and an influential player in New York politics. Its members, who work in 3,500 apartment buildings in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island, held a rally in October urging Cuomo to sign the bill.

Kyle Bragg, the union’s president, said in a statement that 32BJ is “working closely with the governor” to ensure “luxury apartment owners and the wealthiest New Yorkers are paying building-service workers a fair wage with family-sustaining benefits.”

It is unknown what, if any, reason Cuomo provided to lawmakers for not signing the bill. The governor’s press office did not respond to requests for comment.

Buckley said the condo and co-op tax abatement has long been “targeted” because it is a tax break with no strings attached.

Saft agreed. “I think something like this bill is going to be enacted,” he said, noting that he could even see the abatement being wiped out entirely.

“By eliminating the abatement … they raise a lot more money without actually raising taxes. It’s actually a very interesting stealth attack,” he said.

The abatement was originally passed because co-ops and condo owners complained that their property taxes were much higher than those of single-family homes, relative to their market value.

Write to Erin Hudson at [email protected]


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
REBNY president James Whelan (Whelan by Evan Gutierrez)

Tax revenue from NYC property sales plunges $1.4B

Tax revenue from NYC property sales plunges $1.4B
Jersey City residents have voted in support of a new property tax to support the arts (iStock)

Jersey City voters approve property tax to support arts

Jersey City voters approve property tax to support arts
Guo Wengui and the Sherry-Netherland penthouse at 781 Fifth Avenue (Photos via Wikipedia Commons; Getty Images and Douglas Elliman)

Ensconced in the penthouse and entangled in lawsuits

Ensconced in the penthouse and entangled in lawsuits
From left: 25 Park Row, 220 Central Park South, 30 Riverside Blvd (COOKFOX, Getty; StreetEasy)

Odd summer for Manhattan’s condo market

Odd summer for Manhattan’s condo market
Judge Janet DiFiore and Tax Equity Now’s policy director Martha Stark Credit: NY Courts and NYU Wagner)

State’s highest court dismisses property tax reform appeal

State’s highest court dismisses property tax reform appeal
Mayor Bill de Blasio (Getty; iStock)

De Blasio: Raising property taxes “off the table”

De Blasio: Raising property taxes “off the table”
Trump faces $1.5M in Palm Beach County property taxes

Trump faces $1.5M in Palm Beach County property taxes

Trump faces $1.5M in Palm Beach County property taxes
Senegal House renderings (left) and 235 East 44th Street (right (Credit: Urbahn Architects and Google Maps)

Senegal sued again over Midtown tower project “clouded with corruption and cronyism”

Senegal sued again over Midtown tower project “clouded with corruption and cronyism”
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...