Massive Flushing waterfront development stirs opposition

Interim borough president next to weigh in on 29-acre rezoning for $1 billion project

New York /
Feb.February 28, 2020 10:00 AM
An aerial of Flushing's waterfront and New York City Council member Peter Koo (Credit: Google Maps)

An aerial of Flushing’s waterfront and New York City Council member Peter Koo (Credit: Google Maps)

A planned mixed-use development on the Flushing waterfront is meeting steep pushback in Queens.

A proposed rezoning proposed by Flushing Willets Point Corona Local Development Corporation would allow a hotel, retail and 1,700 new apartments at a total cost of $1 billion. The plan is facing local opposition despite a favorable community board vote, City Limits reported.

Annetta Seecharran, executive director of Chhaya CDC, claimed the review process is being “railroaded” while an interim borough president serves in place of Melinda Katz, who became Queens district attorney. But others note that it is following the standard seven-month schedule mandated by the City Charter.

After the community board vote, the interim borough president now has 30 days to review the plan and give her recommendation. But a new borough president will be chosen in just three weeks, in a March 24 special election, and observers say the process should take a beat.

Most of the land in question could be developed without any special approval from the city, and supporters warn that is exactly what would happen.

An attorney representing the developers — a consortium of land owners and other stakeholders — said the rezoning will allow for much more efficient buildings and community benefits including 100 below-market-rate apartments, publicly accessible parkland and a road network integrated with the existing street grid. In exchange, the developers would gain flexibility on a portion of the waterfront now zoned for manufacturing.

“[The proposal] includes a larger waterfront, more open space and a more efficient road network,” said Ross Moskowitz, an attorney who represents the developers. “The rezoning at the northern end also allows for new housing — including affordable — which couldn’t be done if it was built as-of-right.”

Redevelopment plans for the Flushing River waterfront date back to the 1990s. Developers are still taking a wait-and-see approach as the plan makes its way through the review process. New York City Council member Peter Koo, who will ultimately decide the matter, has yet to take a public position on the rezoning. [City Limits] — Georgia Kromrei


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
45 South Grove St in East Orange (Rendering via Progress Capital)
Hero Construction lands $20M loan to build East Orange apartments
Hero Construction lands $20M loan to build East Orange apartments
The rise of e-commerce, fueled by the pandemic, has created unprecedented demand for cardboard-producing facilities. (iStock)
Cardboard demand could fuel an industrial real estate boom
Cardboard demand could fuel an industrial real estate boom
Revitalization Initiatives for the Hampton Bays (South Hampton Town Gov.)
NIMBYs plague rezonings in the Hamptons, too
NIMBYs plague rezonings in the Hamptons, too
Atlas Hospitality Managing Member Raj Guru and Vinod Chand with 711 Seventh Avenue (Atlas, Google Maps)
Atlas plans 401-room hotel at 711 Seventh Avenue
Atlas plans 401-room hotel at 711 Seventh Avenue
Nearly $10M settlement for “cooked” SF condo owners
Nearly $10M settlement for “cooked” SF condo owners
Nearly $10M settlement for “cooked” SF condo owners
Soho’s zoning madness, such as artists-only lofts and a ban on ground-floor retail, may finally change with a proposed rezoning.
The shopping district that banned retail: Soho’s incoherent zoning
The shopping district that banned retail: Soho’s incoherent zoning
L&L Holding’s David Levinson and Columbia Property Trust's Nelson Mills with a rendering of 261 11th Avenue (L&L, Columbia Property Trust, Terminal Warehouse)
L&L, Columbia Property Trust land $1.3B loan for Chelsea office project
L&L, Columbia Property Trust land $1.3B loan for Chelsea office project
Towns and cities have begun restricting housing construction to save their supply of H2O. (iStock)
“Why are we building houses if we don’t have enough water?”: Towns react to scarcity
“Why are we building houses if we don’t have enough water?”: Towns react to scarcity
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...