Aby Rosen accuses Chinese partner of “power grab” after condo loan default

China Vanke acquired interest in $360M loan in backdoor deal, lawsuit alleges

New York /
Oct.October 26, 2020 05:23 PM
100 East 53rd Street,  Vanke US managing director Kai-yan Lee, and RFR's Aby Rosen (Photos via Structure Tone and Getty)

100 East 53rd Street,  Vanke US managing director Kai-yan Lee, and RFR’s Aby Rosen (Photos via Structure Tone and Getty)

UPDATED Oct. 27, 15:45: First came the condo market slowdown. Then came the pandemic. And now, Aby Rosen’s luxury development at 100 East 53rd Street is in crisis because of an improper “backdoor deal.”

The partner, Vanke US, “orchestrated an irreconcilable and grossly improper conflict of interest” that put it “on both sides of the borrower-lender relationship without RFR’s consent,” Rosen’s firm alleges in a lawsuit filed last Friday in New York County Supreme Court, Crain’s reported.

Vanke now has a $115 million interest in a defaulted $360 million loan on the project, which the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China originally provided in 2015. The Chinese developer now has the right to foreclose or make other decisions about the fate of the property while also having insider access to RFR’s plans — making it “a mole for the lenders,” the lawsuit claims.

Dan Perry of Milbank, the law firm representing Vanke US in the suit, said in a statement that his client believes “the lawsuit is without merit.”

“Vanke believes the facts will show that it has consistently taken action to protect the value of the project, whereas RFR has elected to put its own interests ahead of the partnership’s interests,” the statement continues. “Purchasing a subordinate position in the debt was an option of last resort that it believed was necessary to protect its significant equity interest in the project, eliminate the risk of a near-term foreclosure and stabilize the partnership.”

Perry added that Vanke had given RFR the opportunity to purchase a proportionate interest in the debt as well.

RFR had selected Vanke to partner with it on the 63-story, 94-unit development in 2014, “in large part” due to the company’s “sales and marketing channels overseas” which would help attract buyers from China, the lawsuit states.

The group’s high hopes for tapping the Chinese market did not pan out, as capital controls soon put a damper on demand for luxury properties. The loan went into default upon maturity this May.

A few months before the default, according to the suit, Vanke offered to buy 25 of the least expensive condo units for about $75 million, to help pay down the loan and make it possible to get an extension. RFR rejected this as a “self-serving” move that made “no economic sense,” as it would be “saddled with only the most expensive and hardest-to-sell units” in the midst of the pandemic.

RFR notes in the suit that as China’s largest bank and one of its largest residential property developers, respectively, ICBC and Vanke had a longstanding relationship that enabled them to execute this “power grab” — in violation of contractual terms that gave RFR the exclusive right to deal with the lender.

According to prior reports, RFR’s other partners on the development include Hines and China Cinda Asset Management. Those partners are not mentioned in the present lawsuit, and their involvement is unclear. [Crain’s] — Kevin Sun

This story was updated to include Vanke’s response.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Churchill Real Estate's Justin Ehrlich and 381 Broadway (Google Maps)

Two-year Tribeca foreclosure saga continues with lawsuit over $20M

Two-year Tribeca foreclosure saga continues with lawsuit over $20M
Vanke US managing director Kai-yan Lee, RFR’s Aby Rosen and 100 East 53rd Street (Photos via Foster + Partners and Getty)

Vanke seeks to remove RFR from Midtown condo project

Vanke seeks to remove RFR from Midtown condo project
Magnum Real Estate's Ben Shaoul and 87 Leonard Street (Getty; StreetEasy)

Tribeca condo owners sue Magnum Real Estate, seeking $7.6M

Tribeca condo owners sue Magnum Real Estate, seeking $7.6M
Ziel Feldman and 11 East 68th Street (Getty, Google Maps)

Take my condo, please! Ziel Feldman puts his own UES pad on the market

Take my condo, please! Ziel Feldman puts his own UES pad on the market
From left: Ben Ashkenazy, 1991 Broadway, 2067 Broadway and Samuel Gindi (Getty; Google Maps)

Billionaire developer Ben Ashkenazy in feud with investor over reputation, cash

Billionaire developer Ben Ashkenazy in feud with investor over reputation, cash
Renderings of 1045 Madison Avenue and 7 Hubert Street (Photos via The Benson; StreetEasy)

Manhattan luxury market has best week since early March

Manhattan luxury market has best week since early March
New York Wheel (S9 Architecture|Perkins Eastman; Pixabay)

Going in circles: Dueling New York Wheel lawsuits emerge

Going in circles: Dueling New York Wheel lawsuits emerge
HFZ's Ziel Feldman and CIM's Shaul Kuba (Getty, iStock)

HFZ sues CIM to halt condo foreclosure sale

HFZ sues CIM to halt condo foreclosure sale
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...