City Planning approves Special Flushing Waterfront District

Controversial rezoning plan heads to City Council

New York /
Nov.November 04, 2020 12:08 PM
A rendering of the Flushing waterfront and City Planning commissioner Michelle de la Uz (Rendering via Hill West Architects; New York Housing Conference)

A rendering of the Flushing waterfront and City Planning commissioner Michelle de la Uz (Rendering via Hill West Architects; New York Housing Conference)

A controversial 13-tower project planned for Flushing’s waterfront is one step closer to approval.

The City Planning Commission on Wednesday voted in favor of moving forward with the Special Flushing Waterfront District proposal, moving the project on to the City Council for a vote. Overall, the project is expected to include more than 1,700 residential units, 879 hotel rooms and more than 680,000 square feet of commercial space.

Ahead of Wednesday’s vote, CPC Chair Marisa Lago said that the proposal was the culmination of more than two decades of mulling the waterfront’s future and will prove key in helping the city as it “recovers and emerges stronger” from the pandemic.

The proposal would create a 29-acre special district along the Queens waterfront and increase permitted density on one of four sites. The four project sites would be developed separately by F&T Group, Young Nian Group and United Construction and Development Group. As part of the proposal, a new Mandatory Inclusionary Housing area would be established on F&T Group’s parcel. The developer plans to build a 304-unit residential building, where 75 to 90 apartments would be set aside as affordable.

Commissioner Michelle de la Uz, who voted against the proposal, said that the number of affordable units is “laughable considering the size of this project.”

In an interview with The Real Deal this week, Richard Siu, chief investment officer of F&T Group, noted that without the zoning changes, the developers will likely opt to move forward with projects permitted as-of-right. He said the community would lose out on improvements to public spaces and infrastructure, as well as the larger plan connecting downtown Flushing with the waterfront. The result, he said, would be isolated projects akin to Sky View Parc, a nearby luxury condo development.

The project has faced considerable community pushback. The MinKwon Center for Community Action and Chhaya CDC filed a lawsuit in June seeking to block the proposal until an environmental review of the 29-acre area is conducted. During a hearing in September, other community groups expressed concerns that the proposal would accelerate gentrification of the area.

“The loudest people in the room [opposing the proposal] aren’t coming up with any solutions,” Siu said. “We don’t think this is going to gentrify the area.”

The development team has indicated that it is still working with Flushing City Council member Peter Koo’s office. Koo’s approval will likely be crucial to securing support from the broader Council, since members traditionally vote according to the local member’s wishes on land-use matters. A representative for Koo said in a statement that the council member “believes the Special Flushing Waterfront District proposal has many merits that would provide our community with tangible benefits we wouldn’t have under an as-of-right scenario.”

Siu referred to the vote as a “litmus test” for development in the city, following the defeat of the Industry City rezoning.

“In order for the city to get out of its financial straits, it needs to promote growth, not prevent growth,” he said.





    Related Articles

    arrow_forward_ios
    Protestors in support of street vendors gather in Hudson Yards on May 7, 2021 (Getty)
    “More churros, less cops”: Vendors and Related face off
    “More churros, less cops”: Vendors and Related face off
    Andrew Yang (Getty, iStock)
    Yang targets vacant lots with $900 million tax plan
    Yang targets vacant lots with $900 million tax plan
    FiDi condo supply is through the roof as workers delay office return. (Getty)
    FiDi condo glut is through the roof
    FiDi condo glut is through the roof
    32 Avenue of the Americas, Two Metrotech and 60 Hudson Street. (Rudin Management, Brookfield Properties, 60 Hudson, City of New York)
    These properties face credit risk under Local Law 97: Moody’s
    These properties face credit risk under Local Law 97: Moody’s
    626 Lafayette Avenue in Bedford-Stuyvesant and 23-14 96th Street in East Elmhurst (Google Maps)
    Two landlords hit with big fines for SROs, resi additions
    Two landlords hit with big fines for SROs, resi additions
    U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich (Senate/Chris Coons, iStock)
    Judge strikes down federal eviction ban
    Judge strikes down federal eviction ban
    Sen. Brian Kavanagh and RSA President Joe Strasburg (Getty, Strasburg via Jeffersons Siegel)
    Rent relief hinges on dwindling goodwill
    Rent relief hinges on dwindling goodwill
    The Howard Hughes Corporation CEO David O'Reilly (LinkedIn via David O'Reilly)
    Howard Hughes’ (slightly less) big Seaport project approved
    Howard Hughes’ (slightly less) big Seaport project approved
    arrow_forward_ios

    The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

    Loading...