Gary Barnett has another problem at UES site: a stabilized tenant

Standoff with lone tenant demanding “large payout” could produce landmark court ruling

New York /
Jun.June 23, 2021 03:15 PM
Gary Barnett and 352 East 86th Street (Google Maps)

Gary Barnett and 352 East 86th Street (Google Maps)

Notorious landlords aren’t the only thing standing in the way of Gary Barnett’s vision for an Upper East Side development.

There’s also a rent-stabilized tenant still living in one of the remaining buildings at Barnett’s $80 million assemblage on First Avenue between East 85th and 86th Streets, court documents show.

But technically it’s not the tenant who’s holding up Barnett’s firm, Extell Development. It’s the state agency that administers the rent regulations, which is refusing to give Extell the go-ahead to decline the tenant’s lease renewal.

HCR Commissioner RuthAnne Visnauskas

HCR Commissioner RuthAnne Visnauskas

The position of the New York State Division of Homes and Community Renewal is that Extell must reveal its building plans for the site and prove it has the financial ability to build. Extell, which has not publicly filed plans for the site, contests that and accuses the agency of committing an error of law in an Article 78 petition filed last week in New York Supreme Court.

Barnett said his development site, now encumbered by one tenant, should serve as a “poster child” to trigger a change in DHCR’s stance.

“That makes no sense at all if we want New York to grow,” said the developer. “No matter how protective you are about tenants’ rights, there’s no conceivable justification to prevent the building of hundreds of additional housing units, including many which will likely be affordable.”

Though Barnett would not provide details on Extell’s plans for the site, he did say that whatever he builds will include “a large residential component.”

For legal experts, the case is one to watch closely. If the losing party files an appeal, the outcome would set a binding precedent for lower courts and settle a disagreement between industry attorneys.

The agency’s stance is not unique to this project. For decades, DHCR has asked landlords who cite demolition when applying for permission to not renew stabilized leases to submit their plans for the new building and evidence of project financing, according to Sherwin Belkin, a partner at Belkin Burden Goldman.

But just because DHCR’s requests have become routine — and many developers have cooperated by supplying the information — it doesn’t mean they’re legally required to, Belkin argues.

“The owner’s burden is to establish that it can and will demolish — nothing more,” he said. “I think Extell was within its rights.”

Tenants’ attorneys disagree. Steve Wagner of Wagner, Berkow & Brandt pointed to recent case law that “allows DHCR to do exactly what it did in this case.”

But both Wagner and Belkin admit that, until the matter is taken up by the Appellate Division, there will be no binding decision from the court. Regardless of who comes out the victor in Extell’s suit, chances are that the losing party will appeal as both the developer and the tenant have a strong financial interest to do so.

For the tenant, who has lived in the building for 17 years, the ability to receive a large payout hangs in the balance. It’s common for holdout tenants to command millions of dollars in order to vacate buildings, and court documents allude to the tenant at Extell’s site seeking a “large payout.” The tenant did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

For Extell, which has spent seven years and nearly $82 million assembling the site, to have one renter derail its plans would be untenable.

Barnett said that should his firm lose the case, he would “absolutely” appeal.

DHCR declined to comment, citing the ongoing litigation.





    Related Articles

    arrow_forward_ios
    Blackstone CEO Steven Schwartzman and Stuyvesant Town (Credit: Getty Images)
    After authorities vowed review of Stuy Town deal, Blackstone changes course on vacancies
    After authorities vowed review of Stuy Town deal, Blackstone changes course on vacancies
    One Manhattan Square Extell Development CEO Gary Barnett (Credit: Curbed NY)
    Extell lands $690M refinancing package for One Manhattan Square
    Extell lands $690M refinancing package for One Manhattan Square
    Tete-à-tete with TRD: How landlords are dealing with New York’s new rent laws
    Tete-à-tete with TRD: How landlords are dealing with New York’s new rent laws
    Tete-à-tete with TRD: How landlords are dealing with New York’s new rent laws
    Revitalization Initiatives for the Hampton Bays (South Hampton Town Gov.)
    NIMBYs plague rezonings in the Hamptons, too
    NIMBYs plague rezonings in the Hamptons, too
    Atlas Hospitality Managing Member Raj Guru and Vinod Chand with 711 Seventh Avenue (Atlas, Google Maps)
    Atlas plans 401-room hotel at 711 Seventh Avenue
    Atlas plans 401-room hotel at 711 Seventh Avenue
    Nearly $10M settlement for “cooked” SF condo owners
    Nearly $10M settlement for “cooked” SF condo owners
    Nearly $10M settlement for “cooked” SF condo owners
    NAA president Robert Pinnegar (iStock, NAA)
    Landlords sue federal gov’t over rental losses during CDC eviction ban
    Landlords sue federal gov’t over rental losses during CDC eviction ban
    Soho’s zoning madness, such as artists-only lofts and a ban on ground-floor retail, may finally change with a proposed rezoning.
    The shopping district that banned retail: Soho’s incoherent zoning
    The shopping district that banned retail: Soho’s incoherent zoning
    arrow_forward_ios

    The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

    Loading...