LePatner sues former Swig COO for unpaid bills

Construction attorney and consultant alleges developers dodged him, paid themselves

New York /
Mar.March 22, 2022 01:15 PM
From left: 320 West 115th Street, Barry LePatner and Steven Kirschenbaum (320 West 115th Street, LePatner, LinkedIn)

From left: 320 West 115th Street, Barry LePatner and Steven Kirschenbaum (320 West 115th Street, LePatner, LinkedIn)

A Lannister always pays his debts. But a condo developer in financial straits? Possibly not, according to a new lawsuit from construction attorney and consultant Barry LePatner.

Since 2018, LePatner has been suing Steven Kirschenbaum and Ronald Winkler, the developers of 320 West 115th Street, alleging they owe him a raft of bills for his work to get their struggling project across the finish line.

A judge has already ordered Kirschenbaum and Winkler to pay LePatner some of the money he alleges they’ve withheld. But LePatner is suing again, claiming the two haven’t paid up, even after they’ve paid themselves roughly $3 million.

The spat started in March 2018, when LePatner sued Kirschenbaum and Winkler over $640,000 in unpaid bills from his time as a project manager on their condo development at 320 West 115th Street in Harlem. The suit stalled through the pandemic, but a judge in September ordered the developers to pay LePatner about $184,000, plus $46.58 per day in interest.

The judgment only settled one of LePatner’s claims — the rest, worth about $500,000 plus interest, remain unresolved.

Kirschenbaum and Winkler’s project dates back to 2014, when they purchased two lots on 115th Street for $3.9 million.

They planned to combine and renovate the properties, developing a six-unit condo with a $12 to $16 million sellout. The project hit several roadblocks, as the construction management firm misused project money and performed shoddy work. In the fall of 2016, the developers hired LePatner to stop the bleeding and bring their condos across the finish line.

Work finished in late 2017, and by the end of the year, the developers had sold five of the six units. The final apartment went in 2018, and Kirschenbaum and Winkler reported $15.4 million in gross revenue, the suit alleges. LePatner had agreed to delay payment until closing the fourth apartment, citing cash flow issues on the project. But after the unit closed in December 2017, he never got paid.

Kirschenbaum and Winkler said in a deposition last year their development venture was insolvent, hence the delay in payment. But LePatner fired back by producing the project ledger, which shows they transferred more than $3 million of LLC assets to themselves — $937,439 to Kirschenbaum and $2.15 million to Winkler — $690,000 of which were transferred after LePatner started his lawsuit. (Winkler disputes the amount of one of the transfers. If correct, his amount would drop to $1.88 million.)

Neither partner denies the transfers, and told the court they were paying themselves back for personal loans they made to the development company. But LePatner argues the payments constitute fraud, as they were transferring project funds to company managers. He also calls into question the amount they paid themselves: they fronted about $1.9 million, according to court documents, putting interest on the payments around $1 million.

The developers say they disputed LePatner’s invoices in 2018, arguing that he misrepresented his negotiations with the construction lender, Avant. They claim LePatner told them Avant offered them an extension on the loan as the timeline dragged on, saving them from default and default interest. As a result, they say, they chose not to refinance as the development came together.

“The default interest blindsided us, just when they knew the work was complete, TCOs were in hand and closings were to begin,” they wrote in an email to LePatner. “It’s as if we ran 50 yards in an open field to the goal line and spiked the ball on the 1 yard line only to have the lender recover the fumble.”

They also say LePatner failed to secure a permit the day before sewer and gas hookups were set to be connected, delaying the project. LePatner disputes all the claims and declined to comment through his attorney, Jason A. Stern.

Kirschenbaum was the chief operating officer of Swig Equities for nearly 13 years. Thomas Mollaney, the attorney representing the former executive and Winkler, didn’t respond to a request for comment.





    Related Articles

    arrow_forward_ios
    Seth Boyden Court in Newark NJ with Great Point Studios CEO Robert Halmi (Loopnet, Great Point Studios, iStock)
    Film studio to replace vacant public housing in Newark
    Film studio to replace vacant public housing in Newark
    Harry and Linda Macklowe (Getty Images, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc./Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY, Sotheby's, iStock)
    Macklowe art collection fetches nearly $1B at auction
    Macklowe art collection fetches nearly $1B at auction
    A photo illustration of charter bus company North Fork Express (left), Tritec Real Estate's planned Ronkonkoma Hub project (middle) and Tritec Real Estate's principal Robert Coughlan (EverybodyWiki/Orenawong, Tritec Real Estate, iStock)
    Holdout threatens massive Long Island development
    Holdout threatens massive Long Island development
    Midwood’s John Usdan and 210 Douglass Street (Midwood)
    Landlord in rush for 421a booted Gowanus business: lawsuit
    Landlord in rush for 421a booted Gowanus business: lawsuit
    Elad Group's Isaac Tshuva and1299 Third Avenue (Getty, Google Maps)
    Elad picks up shovel-ready UES development site
    Elad picks up shovel-ready UES development site
    Charles Cohen of Cohen Brothers Realty Corporation with 975 Anderson Hill Road in Rye Brook, NY (Google Maps, Wikipedia)
    Charles Cohen eyeing Rye Brook redevelopment
    Charles Cohen eyeing Rye Brook redevelopment
    Patrick Nelson of Nelson Partners Student Housing and the Skyloft Austin (Nelson Partners Student Housing, STG Design, iStock)
    Languishing student housing firm on the hook for $50M
    Languishing student housing firm on the hook for $50M
    (iStock, Illustration by Shea Monahan for the Real Deal)
    As lawmakers race to electrify buildings, industry pushes back
    As lawmakers race to electrify buildings, industry pushes back
    arrow_forward_ios

    The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

    Loading...