Mauricio Umansky calls disputed mansion sale he brokered “unique,” in countersuit

The Agency co-founder still faces a federal lawsuit alleging he conspired with investor to underpay for the home

TRD LOS ANGELES /
Sep.September 19, 2018 08:00 AM
Mauricio Umansky (Credit: iStock)

One month after Agency co-founder Mauricio Umansky was hit with a federal lawsuit for allegedly conspiring with another investor to underpay for a Malibu mansion then flip the property, he has countersued. Umansky also sought to dismiss the initial charges.

But a judge has allowed the first case to proceed, and now with Umansky’s counterclaim, the legal turmoil surrounding the case shows no signs of letting up.

In the initial June complaint against Umansky, Western World Insurance claimed he misled the owner of the Malibu mansion into selling the property to Mauricio Oberfeld for below market value. Umansky also invested in the home. The insurance company sued, seeking relief from having to pay any damages to the seller for the lost proceeds.

Umansky and Oberfeld later flipped the home for $70 million, more than double what they paid, according to Western World’s suit. The insurance company also alleges Umansky hid higher offers on the property.

But according to Umanksy’s countersuit, he “did exactly what he was retained to do” by selling the 15,000-square-foot mansion on Sweetwater Road in Malibu to Oberfeld. “He sold the Sweetwater Property with virtually no publicity, under a strict deadline, and at a price above the appraised value,” according to the countersuit, filed late last month.

Umansky was tapped as the listing agent to sell the property in May 2015. The seller, Teodoro Nguema Obiang, the son of Equatorial Guinea president Teodoro Obiang, had struck a deal with the U.S. government that required he sell the property and give proceeds of the sales to both his native country and the United States.

U.S. prosecutors accused the younger Obiang of using stolen funds to purchase a number of lavish assets, including the mansion in Malibu.

In the counter-complaint, Umansky called the sale of the mansion “unique.”

“The entire transaction was subject to the terms of a settlement agreement between the U.S. and the seller, and every aspect of the transaction was reviewed and approved by the U.S. Department of Justice,” the suit alleges.

Umansky is requesting reimbursement for any legal costs incurred, as well as compensatory and punitive damages.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Billy Rose, Rainy Hake Austin

Changes at the top at The Agency

Changes at the top at The Agency
Brian Chesky (Credit: Richard Bord/Getty Images, Airbnb, and iStock)

Airbnb sues booking guest over unauthorized house party

Airbnb sues booking guest over unauthorized house party
Clare Bronfman and 8517 Franklin Avenue (Patrick McMullan/Getty, Zillow)

Heiress and sex cult financier sues over West Hollywood swimming pool

Heiress and sex cult financier sues over West Hollywood swimming pool
NAR CEO Bob Goldberg (iStock)

NAR pockets win in resi listings antitrust case

NAR pockets win in resi listings antitrust case
712 Olive St. (Credit: Google Maps)

Lawsuits force Atlas Capital’s DTLA project to chart new path

Lawsuits force Atlas Capital’s DTLA project to chart new path
Mauricio Umansky and the office (Credit: Google Maps)

The Agency closes Palm Springs office amid larger cuts

The Agency closes Palm Springs office amid larger cuts
6100 Wilshire Blvd. (Credit: Google Maps)

Hakim family siphoned rent money instead of paying full mortgage on Onyx Tower: lawsuit

Hakim family siphoned rent money instead of paying full mortgage on Onyx Tower: lawsuit
Kevin Garnett and his Malibu property (Credit: Streeter Lecka/Getty Images, and Hilton & Hyland)

Kevin Garnett out of bounds with nonpayment on mansion work, lawsuit alleges

Kevin Garnett out of bounds with nonpayment on mansion work, lawsuit alleges
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...