Under the (RE)influence: Councilman’s campaign funds scrutinized

Challengers say David Ryu is breaking his promise to refuse developer dollars

Los Angeles /
Nov.November 11, 2019 09:02 AM
David Ryu with a Little Tokyo Galleria rendering
David Ryu with a Little Tokyo Galleria rendering

A Los Angeles City Councilmember who sought to burnish a reputation as an outsider who would not take real estate developer money is…returning real estate developer money.

Challengers of Councilmember David Ryu argue he broke his promise to not take donations from developers, an integral part of his first election bid and a central issue during his time in office, according to the L.A. Times.

Opponents identified donations from entities linked to Little Tokyo Galleria developer Dae Yong Lee and the investment company First Serrano Apartment LLC.

“What’s the point of a pledge to not take money from a few developers if the real estate industry, including many developers, is still propping you up?” said candidate Nithya Raman, who promised to refuse donations from “people involved in the real estate industry in Los Angeles.”

Ryu said he’s making good on his promise to refuse developer dollars, but that some of those donations slipped through the cracks. He said he welcomed “anyone and everybody from the press and the community to help me identify errors,” and would refund a dozen donations.

Ryu and two City Council colleagues introduced a bill to ban Councilmembers from taking donations from active developers in 2017, but it failed to move forward until earlier this year after a scandal broke involving donations made to organizations associated with Councilmember Jose Huizar.

Ryu told The Real Deal in August that a ban would help build trust with voters that he called “almost non-existent.”

Ryu’s campaign will not refund other donations that challengers have criticized, including some from architects and land use consultants who help guide developers through the city approvals process. His donation policy applies to developers with “active projects” or those who regularly work in the city.

Challenger Sarah Kate Levy said that wasn’t enough because all developers who don’t meet that criteria will at some point or another have a project under consideration at City Hall. [LAT]Dennis Lynch


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Monastery of the Angels (Google Maps, iStock)
Preservationists aim to acquire Hollywood Hills monastery
Preservationists aim to acquire Hollywood Hills monastery
Jeff Blau with 1755 Argyle St (LinkedIn, Commercial Observer)
Related Companies to sell Argyle House in Hollywood
Related Companies to sell Argyle House in Hollywood
CIM Group’s Shaul Kuba with renderings of the project at 6007 Sunset Blvd in Hollywood (Cim Group, Getty)
CIM clears hurdle toward building 109-unit complex in Hollywood
CIM clears hurdle toward building 109-unit complex in Hollywood
Artist Guild Hotels' Daniel Hyde and the Palmer Building (LinkedIn, AGI)
Hollywood’s historic Palmer Building could become hotel with rooftop restaurant
Hollywood’s historic Palmer Building could become hotel with rooftop restaurant
Select properties from Redwood Urban (Redwood Urban, iStock)
Redwood Urban scores refi on Beverly Hills, Hollywood, Long Beach apartments
Redwood Urban scores refi on Beverly Hills, Hollywood, Long Beach apartments
Ed Scheetz and Ian Schrager with the Standard Hotel (Getty, Google Maps)
Standard Hollywood on way to historic status
Standard Hollywood on way to historic status
Ed Scheetz and former Standard Hotel in Hollywood (Getty Images, iStock, Illustration by Kevin Cifuentes for The Real Deal)
The Standard Hollywood isn’t necessarily history
The Standard Hollywood isn’t necessarily history
5507 Hollywood Boulevard (Google Maps, iStock)
CIM Group sells Hollywood retail to local investor
CIM Group sells Hollywood retail to local investor
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...