AGs clash over proposed mortgage settlement

TRD MIAMI /
Mar.March 15, 2011 01:58 PM

State attorneys general are butting heads over a proposed settlement with loan servicers over their faulty foreclosure practices, according to HousingWire. The proposal is the result of an investigation launched in October into some of the nation’s largest mortgage lenders after a scandal revealed widespread errors in foreclosure documentation. But it appears there’s still quite a bit of negotiating to do. According to a spokesperson for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, “we haven’t even begun face-to-face discussions with the banks yet.” Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said he hasn’t even seen the settlement, and Scott Pruitt, the attorney general from Oklahoma, has openly declared that he is against the idea of forcing servicers into principal write-downs. Virginia Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli has said at least a dozen states, including Virginia, oppose the deal. Each attorney general would have to sign off on the settlement in order for banks to be subject to the new regulations in their individual states. [HousingWire]


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Placeholder image

Appellate court sides with Miami homeowners

Placeholder image

Robo-signing boss gets 5-year jail sentence

Placeholder image

Fla. lawyers getting away with foreclosure fraud

Placeholder image

Foreclosure practices at eight more financial firms catch Fed’s wrath

Placeholder image

Fannie Mae has ignored foreclosure problems since before the crisis

Obama administration earns bi-partisan scorn for forthcoming foreclosure settlement with banks

Placeholder image

Fannie’s many chances to stop robo-signing went ignored: report

Placeholder image

FHFA protects Fannie Mae internal foreclosure investigation from public eye

arrow_forward_ios