NAR figures need further revision: analysts

Dec.December 28, 2011 03:46 PM

Earlier this month, the National Association of Realtors announced it would revise its existing home sales data for the last four years. But some critics, notably independent housing economist Thomas Lawler, said those revisions won’t fix the egregious errors the association has made in its calculations, and NAR needs to change its methodology, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Last week, NAR revised its figures by about 14 percent, indicating that far fewer previously occupied homes had sold than they knew of. Now, analysts are saying they are still wrong.

A spokesperson for NAR, said the association plans to publish revised estimates of home sales by state, on Feb. 9, but that it will not change which research methods it uses.

“Their revised estimates are better, but I’m not convinced they are all that much better,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist with Moody’s Analytics.

Lawler contends that local property records in California indicate that NAR’s numbers are at least 20 percent off. Lawler and others said that the census data NAR uses is less accurate than local property records. He points out, for example, that NAR’S reported 33 percent rise in condominium sales in the western U.S. seemS improbable. [WSJ]

Related Articles

A house with a real estate agent (Credit: iStock)

New lawsuits raise question of who should pay homebuyer’s agent

NAR CEO Bob Goldberg (left) and Crexi CEO Michael DeGiorgio

NAR inks partnership with Crexi

Placeholder image

Housing affordability drops, as market recovery takes hold

Placeholder image

Renewal of mortgage debt forgiveness legislation seen as crucial to housing recovery

Placeholder image

Low appraisals holding back housing recovery, Realtors group says

Placeholder image

Little preventing a new housing bubble: experts

Placeholder image

Home sales up 34 percent from recession-low

Placeholder image

NAR has published bad existing home sales data for years, association admits