Landlords shun federal rent relief over program requirements

Aid roll-out varies state-by-state

National /
Mar.March 19, 2021 12:30 PM
(iStock/Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)

(iStock/Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)

The federal government wants to give landlords and tenants $50 billion to help keep renters in their homes — but some of those property owners are turning down the funding that they’re eligible for.

Some landlords have taken issue with the requirements to receive federal rent relief, including disclosing financial information, as well as limits on evicting tenants if they choose to do so, the Wall Street Journal reported.

In Boston, a tenant attorney said that a fifth of his cases involve a landlord who has refused the funds. A Houston nonprofit tasked with distributing the funds said that in 5,600 cases, landlords shunned the relief. In Los Angeles, nearly half of the tenants who received rent relief had landlords who declined to participate in the program.

While federal requirements stipulate the money should be used to pay rent for low-income tenants, individual states have broad discretion over how the programs are implemented. Those differences can be dramatic: In Broward County, Florida, the rent relief will only make up for 60 percent of back rent if what’s unpaid exceeds a month’s rent.

Some landlords, faced with keeping a non-paying tenant and accepting a discounted rent versus finding a new tenant who may be in a better position to pay, are choosing the latter. The ban on federal evictions, which expires at the end of March, does not mandate that landlords renew current leases.

“If you have someone who wasn’t upholding their end of the contract…you’re asking the housing provider to sign up for essentially another year of this person being in this unit unable to pay,” Amanda Gill, government affairs director for the Florida Apartment Association, an industry trade group, told the publication.

“You’re really putting them in a really difficult position, because they have ongoing obligations,” Gill said.

[WSJ] — Georgia Kromrei






    Related Articles

    arrow_forward_ios
    President Joe Biden and NAR president Charlie Oppler (Getty, NAR)
    Biden’s new eviction moratorium immediately challenged in court
    Biden’s new eviction moratorium immediately challenged in court
    Texas courts ignore federal ban on evictions
    Texas courts ignore federal ban on evictions
    Texas courts ignore federal ban on evictions
    Canada’s Public Sector Pension Investment Board CEO Neil Cunningham (left) and Allianz SE CEO Oliver Bäte (PSP Investments, Allianz, iStock)
    Canadian pensions, Asian wealth funds eye single-family home rentals
    Canadian pensions, Asian wealth funds eye single-family home rentals
    (iStock/Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)
    Investors increasingly compete with first-time buyers for homes
    Investors increasingly compete with first-time buyers for homes
    CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky (Getty, iStock)
    CDC extends national eviction ban through June
    CDC extends national eviction ban through June
    U.S. District Judge Philip Calabrese (Porter Wright, Google Maps, iStock)
    Ohio judge blocks federal eviction ban, but stops short of injunction
    Ohio judge blocks federal eviction ban, but stops short of injunction
    U.S. District Judge John Campbell Barker, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, ruled the eviction moratorium to be unconstitutional. (Getty, Texas Attorney General)
    National eviction moratorium ruled unconstitutional, but remains in place
    National eviction moratorium ruled unconstitutional, but remains in place
    (Getty, iStock/ Illustration by Alexis Manrodt for The Real Deal)
    A reckoning on rent
    A reckoning on rent
    arrow_forward_ios

    The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

    Loading...