Trending

SF to require landlords pay for seismic inspections

Owners encouraged to retrofit older concrete buildings

San Francisco Senior Earthquake Resilience Analyst Laurel Mathews (Getty, Linkedin)
Listen to this article
00:00
1x

Key Points

AI Generated.
This summary is reviewed by TRD Staff.
  • San Francisco is requiring landlords to pay for seismic risk assessments of their buildings, particularly targeting around 4,000 older concrete structures.
  • The program aims to encourage voluntary seismic retrofits of these buildings due to their vulnerability in earthquakes, although the cost of inspections and retrofits is currently undisclosed.
  • A city analyst referenced a building collapse in Christchurch, New Zealand, as an example of the potential danger of older concrete buildings during a major earthquake.

Landlords across San Francisco must soon foot the bill to make sure their 4,000 buildings are seismically sound.

The Board of Supervisors approved a safety program that encourages building owners to carry out retrofits after years of warnings that older concrete buildings have greater risks from earthquakes, the San Francisco Examiner reported.

The retrofits are voluntary. But the new program requires owners of potentially vulnerable buildings to foot the bill for a professional risk assessment of their buildings.

An estimated cost of inspecting the thousands of buildings — let alone retrofitting them — was not disclosed.

“It’s really difficult to know the true risk and true impact without first understanding the scale of the challenge,” Laurel Mathews, a senior earthquake resilience analyst for the city, told a  committee meeting on the issue.

For several decades, San Francisco has completed several seismic retrofits, including requiring landlords to shore up the ground floors in thousands of soft-story, wood-framed buildings, completed in 2021.

Sign Up for the undefined Newsletter

That leaves the risk posed by older concrete buildings, which city officials say lack the steel reinforcements that reduce the risk of major earthquake damage.

They say that’s mostly because retrofitting concrete buildings is costly and time consuming. In residential buildings, it can also mean moving tenants out while work is completed.

Whatever the inconvenience, however, the risks for San Francisco remain daunting.

Mathews pointed to the Pyne Gould building in Christchurch, New Zealand, built in the 1960s before modern building standards. The five-story building collapsed in 2011 during a major earthquake, killing 18 people trapped inside.

“We don’t expect every concrete building to perform this poorly in an earthquake,” Mathews told the committee. But the accident “demonstrates the worst-case scenario that we’re trying to avoid.”

Dana Bartholomew

Read more

Residential
San Francisco
Rare “earthquake shack” lists for sale in SF’s Bernal Heights
Gold Rush home in San Francisco lists for $22M
Residential
San Francisco
Gold Rush home in San Francisco lists for $22M
Development
San Francisco
Battle over San Francisco's Historic quake shacks
Recommended For You