Flush with cash, Brooklyn Bridge Park tussles over development plans

High property values already cover the cost of maintaining the park, critics say

TRD New York /
Feb.February 24, 2017 10:10 AM

Pierhouse at Brooklyn Bridge Park (Credit: Toll Brothers City Living)

Is Brooklyn Bridge Park suffering from too much of a good thing? With the park poised to see a windfall of revenue from private development, locals are coming out against future building along the East River.

The argument is the latest skirmish in the long-running dispute over development at the park. At issue now are higher property valuations for the four existing developments at the park, which help pay for the park’s maintenance, the Wall Street Journal reported.

While park administrators want to add a fifth development, they’re facing opposition from the Brooklyn Heights Association, which sued last year to stop the project and now say the park has enough money without the fifth project.

The planned development would include two residential buildings with 266 units, including 100 affordable apartments. Developers RAL Development Services TRData LogoTINY and Oliver’s Realty Group signed a 93-year lease at the foot of Pier 6 last year, agreeing to pay $104 million.

But in the lawsuit, BHA members said the city promised to forgo development if the park didn’t need additional revenue to maintain the park.
Recent valuations, they say, support their case.

Pierhouse, a condominium developed by Toll Brothers where for-sale units average $5.8 million, for example, was valued at $230 per square foot by the city’s Department of Finance, BHA claimed. That’s 56 percent higher than the $147 per foot projections by the park corporation. The difference could yield $1.1 million for the park, or 12 percent of its annual budget next year. Over the next 50 years, the additional revenue could swell by $300 million.

Park advocates say that windfall eliminates the need for further development, but the city maintains the money is required to repair up to 13,000 timber pilings that support the park. David Lowin, the park corporation’s interim president, called the higher valuation “simply incorrect and misleading,” in a court filing in September.

“We have repeatedly made clear the necessity and merits of this project, and look forward to responding to [the neighborhood group’s] erroneous claims in court,” he told the Journal. [WSJ]E.B. Solomont

Related Articles

40 East 72nd Street (Credit: Google Maps)

Nightmare on E. 72nd Street raises question: Are small condos risky?

Jed Garfield of Leslie J. Garfield; Richard Grossman, president of Halstead Real Estate; Sarah Saltzberg, principal broker and CEO of Bohemia Realty Group; Douglas Elliman’s Howard Lorber

NYC brokers slam bias, promise action after Newsday exposé

The bombshell probe also found that minorities had to meet more stringent financial qualifications than white buyers. (Credit: iStock)

LI agents routinely discriminate against minority buyers, undercover probe finds

Zillow CEO Rich Barton (Credit: iStock)

Zillow and Opendoor aren’t making much on home-flipping

This week, the State Department of Taxation and Finance issued a new memo that notably made no mention of condos. (Credit: iStock)

Regulators quietly change stance on condos in LLC law

Realogy CEO Ryan Schneider (Credit: iStock)

Realogy’s plan to stop the iBuyers from gaining a foothold in Chicago

Daily Digest Thursday

Worker killed at Lam Group construction site, Uber signs WTC lease: Daily digest

Developers are offering to pay the increased mansion and transfer taxes to give them an edge in a difficult market. (Credit: iStock)

Amid slow sales, developers give buyers a break on mansion taxes