Benenson, Mack may have to eat “extraordinary construction costs” at East Village site after all

The companies withdrew a variance application for their proposed development at 432 East 14th Street

TRD New York /
Mar.March 28, 2017 06:00 PM

Renderings of 432 East 14th Street (Credit: Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, Click to enlarge)

Benenson Capital Partners and Mack Real Estate have again backtracked on plans to develop an East Village site.

After complaining that $4.6 million worth of “extraordinary construction costs” from poor ground conditions at 432 East 14th Street would “make a complying development infeasible,” the developers withdrew an application that would have allowed them to build higher than zoning regulations allow.

The proposed development at 432 E. 14th Street will therefore have to go on without the additional income from a larger building.

The move comes after Benenson TRData LogoTINY and Mack pared back their initial plans earlier this month in response to community pressure.

According to the revised application  submitted on March 10, current zoning laws allow the developers to construct a mixed-use Building With Eight Stories On The East 13th Street side and seven stories on the East 14th Street side. The structure would include 23 affordable and 90 market-rate residential units on 87,813 square feet of residential space. Prior plans filed earlier this month called for a 12-story mixed-use building totaling 155 residential units with 31 apartments designated as affordable.

A larger development was necessary, the developers argued, to increase profitability and make up for added construction costs stemming from “[u]nusually elevated groundwater levels and exceedingly soft and unstable soil.” Both developments would cost over $100 million, Benenson and Mack estimate.

In a statement, Andrew Berman, executive director of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation (GVSHP), celebrated the news of the developers dropping the variance request.

GVSHP disputed the developers’ “hardship” claim regarding ground conditions, arguing that neighboring properties did not receive a variance.

In a statement, a spokesperson for building ownership wrote, “It is unfortunate that we were not able to deliver even more affordable units to the community, as we had hoped to do.”


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
From left: The Blau and Berg Company's Karine Blanc, TD and Partners' Nana Duncan and Lemor Development Group's Kenneth Morrison (Credit: Blauberg, TD+Partners and Lemor)

Black developers say partnerships aren’t always equal

85 4th Avenue in Brooklyn (Credit: Google Maps)

New details of Boerum Hill’s next big project unveiled

TF Cornerstone president Frederick Elghanayan and 595 Dean Street (Credit: CityRealty, Google Maps)

TF Cornerstone’s Prospect Heights two-tower project unveiled

Assemblyman David Chiu and Gov. Gavin Newsom (Credit: Wikipedia and iStock)

California passes landmark rent control law

The Watchtower building at 25 Columbia Heights, CIM Group’s Shaul Kuba (right) and LIVWRK’s Asher Abehsera (Credit: Wikipedia, CIM Group, and LinkedIn)

JPMorgan leads $335M refi for CIM and LIVWRK’s Watchtower renovation

Chicago’s top 5 general contractor firms were approved to build over 9 million square feet of new development

The construction giants catching a Windy City windfall

David Marx of MDG Real Estate and the site at 71-05 Parsons Boulevard in Queens (Credit: Google Images and iStock)

Here’s a weird one: David Marx plans towers at Queens site he bought from his own company

Resi scorecard: Brooklyn and Queens condo inventory through June 2019

Resi scorecard: Brooklyn and Queens condo inventory through June 2019

arrow_forward_ios