Benenson, Mack may have to eat “extraordinary construction costs” at East Village site after all

The companies withdrew a variance application for their proposed development at 432 East 14th Street

New York /
Mar.March 28, 2017 06:00 PM

Benenson Capital Partners and Mack Real Estate have again backtracked on plans to develop an East Village site.

After complaining that $4.6 million worth of “extraordinary construction costs” from poor ground conditions at 432 East 14th Street would “make a complying development infeasible,” the developers withdrew an application that would have allowed them to build higher than zoning regulations allow.

The proposed development at 432 E. 14th Street will therefore have to go on without the additional income from a larger building.

The move comes after Benenson TRData LogoTINY and Mack pared back their initial plans earlier this month in response to community pressure.

According to the revised application  submitted on March 10, current zoning laws allow the developers to construct a mixed-use Building With Eight Stories On The East 13th Street side and seven stories on the East 14th Street side. The structure would include 23 affordable and 90 market-rate residential units on 87,813 square feet of residential space. Prior plans filed earlier this month called for a 12-story mixed-use building totaling 155 residential units with 31 apartments designated as affordable.

A larger development was necessary, the developers argued, to increase profitability and make up for added construction costs stemming from “[u]nusually elevated groundwater levels and exceedingly soft and unstable soil.” Both developments would cost over $100 million, Benenson and Mack estimate.

In a statement, Andrew Berman, executive director of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation (GVSHP), celebrated the news of the developers dropping the variance request.

GVSHP disputed the developers’ “hardship” claim regarding ground conditions, arguing that neighboring properties did not receive a variance.

In a statement, a spokesperson for building ownership wrote, “It is unfortunate that we were not able to deliver even more affordable units to the community, as we had hoped to do.”


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
The Economic Innovation Group identified 145 real estate investments in Opportunity Zones (iStock)

Real estate deals dominate Opportunity Zones. Is that bad?

Real estate deals dominate Opportunity Zones. Is that bad?
The Grand Hyatt Hotel at 109 East 42nd Street and and  RXR’s Scott Rechler (Wikipedia Commons; Getty)

Grand Hyatt redevelopment could be 1,600-foot supertall

Grand Hyatt redevelopment could be 1,600-foot supertall
A rendering of Gowanus Green and HPD commissioner Louise Carroll (Rendering via Jonathan Rose Companies)

Massive Gowanus development will be 100% affordable

Massive Gowanus development will be 100% affordable
Sheldon Solow (Getty)

Billionaire developer Sheldon Solow dies at 92

Billionaire developer Sheldon Solow dies at 92
Peter Koo and the Flushing waterfront (Facebook, Flushing Waterfront, rendering by Jeff Strikeman Architectural Art)

Flushing … another project down the toilet?

Flushing … another project down the toilet?
Photo-illustration (images via Getty)

Kiss the ring: City pols weigh heavy on development in these major markets

Kiss the ring: City pols weigh heavy on development in these major markets
Alex Sapir’s family closes on luxury condos at Sapir’s Miami development

Alex Sapir’s family closes on luxury condos at Sapir’s Miami development

Alex Sapir’s family closes on luxury condos at Sapir’s Miami development
A rendering of the Flushing waterfront and City Planning commissioner Michelle de la Uz (Rendering via Hill West Architects; New York Housing Conference)

City Planning approves Special Flushing Waterfront District

City Planning approves Special Flushing Waterfront District
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...