Benenson, Mack may have to eat “extraordinary construction costs” at East Village site after all

The companies withdrew a variance application for their proposed development at 432 East 14th Street

New York /
Mar.March 28, 2017 06:00 PM

Benenson Capital Partners and Mack Real Estate have again backtracked on plans to develop an East Village site.

After complaining that $4.6 million worth of “extraordinary construction costs” from poor ground conditions at 432 East 14th Street would “make a complying development infeasible,” the developers withdrew an application that would have allowed them to build higher than zoning regulations allow.

The proposed development at 432 E. 14th Street will therefore have to go on without the additional income from a larger building.

The move comes after Benenson TRData LogoTINY and Mack pared back their initial plans earlier this month in response to community pressure.

According to the revised application  submitted on March 10, current zoning laws allow the developers to construct a mixed-use Building With Eight Stories On The East 13th Street side and seven stories on the East 14th Street side. The structure would include 23 affordable and 90 market-rate residential units on 87,813 square feet of residential space. Prior plans filed earlier this month called for a 12-story mixed-use building totaling 155 residential units with 31 apartments designated as affordable.

A larger development was necessary, the developers argued, to increase profitability and make up for added construction costs stemming from “[u]nusually elevated groundwater levels and exceedingly soft and unstable soil.” Both developments would cost over $100 million, Benenson and Mack estimate.

In a statement, Andrew Berman, executive director of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation (GVSHP), celebrated the news of the developers dropping the variance request.

GVSHP disputed the developers’ “hardship” claim regarding ground conditions, arguing that neighboring properties did not receive a variance.

In a statement, a spokesperson for building ownership wrote, “It is unfortunate that we were not able to deliver even more affordable units to the community, as we had hoped to do.”


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
BLDG Management founder Lloyd Goldman (iStock)
BLDG plans 800K-sf tower in Long Island City
BLDG plans 800K-sf tower in Long Island City
Gary Barnett and Jay and Stuart Podolsky in front of 1645 First Avenue (Getty, Google Maps)
Gary Barnett site has one problem: the Podolsky brothers
Gary Barnett site has one problem: the Podolsky brothers
Oceanwide’s US business is sinking. Can it right the ship?
Oceanwide’s US business is sinking. Can it right the ship?
Oceanwide’s US business is sinking. Can it right the ship?
Renderings of The Eliza Apartments at the Redeveloped Inwood Library (New York Housing Conference)
Inwood affordable housing project moves forward after rezoning fight
Inwood affordable housing project moves forward after rezoning fight
Demir Sabanci and 41-47 West 57th Street (Sedesco, Google Maps)
Sedesco seeks rezoning for new Billionaires’ Row skyscraper
Sedesco seeks rezoning for new Billionaires’ Row skyscraper
611 St. Johns Place, Brooklyn, NY (Getty)
Workforce Housing Group solar deal will also pay for broadband
Workforce Housing Group solar deal will also pay for broadband
Hudson Yards (iStock)
EB-5 program set to expire at the end of June
EB-5 program set to expire at the end of June
(iStock/Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)
New housing construction leaves US 5.5 million units short
New housing construction leaves US 5.5 million units short
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...