Can iBuying survive a market slowdown?

Practice represents Silicon Valley’s latest attempt to disrupt real estate

TRD NATIONAL /
May.May 07, 2019 09:45 AM
Last year, rising interest rates led to a slowdown, and Redfin ended up selling homes at a loss. (Credit: iStock)

Last year, rising interest rates led to a slowdown, and Redfin ended up selling homes at a loss. (Credit: iStock)

Even as established real estate players enter the iBuying game, skeptics are questioning the sustainability of the new home-selling practice.

Some critics view the business as overhyped and capital-intensive, and they think it will fizzle out once investors get tired of thin profit margins, according to the New York Times. They are also concerned about the risk and volatility it could bring to the housing industry.

Last year, rising interest rates led to a slowdown, and Redfin ended up selling homes at a loss. Though the market rebounded, Redfin chief executive Glenn Kelman said that “If rates had continued going up and the housing market continued going down, it would have been a squeeze.”

Zillow, which bought less than 700 homes last year but expects to buy 5,000 per month over the next few years, said it doesn’t expect much money from its iBuying program. Instead, it sees the platform as a means to bring business to its mortgage-lending arm.

But the process is still growing. Opendoor, which last year landed a $400 million investment from SoftBank, bought more than 11,000 homes last year and has raised more than $1 billion to speed up its process. Traditional brokerages like Realogy and Keller Williams are planning to break into the instant-buying market as well.

Markets like Phoenix and Las Vegas have already proven to be popular spots for the practice, but it has yet to take off in the Northeast. It also remains to be seen whether the practice can sustain a slowdown in the housing market and whether enough buyers are willing to accept the risk of a fast home sale.

“The biggest headwind to this getting mass traction is human psychology,” said industry analyst Mike DelPrete. “The bigger the potential downside, the more risk averse they are.” [NYT]  – Eddie Small


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Eric Gordon

Eric Gordon on the evolution of the residential data game — and how to stay competitive in the new world

Big Tech locations in NYC

MAP: Here’s a look at all the Big Tech locations in NYC

What will proptech look like in 2019 and beyond?

What will proptech look like in 2019 and beyond?

Masayoshi Son

Small Talk: Our foolproof plan to get SoftBank’s investments back on track

40 East 72nd Street (Credit: Google Maps)

Nightmare on E. 72nd Street raises question: Are small condos risky?

Jed Garfield of Leslie J. Garfield; Richard Grossman, president of Halstead Real Estate; Sarah Saltzberg, principal broker and CEO of Bohemia Realty Group; Douglas Elliman’s Howard Lorber

NYC brokers slam bias, promise action after Newsday exposé

The bombshell probe also found that minorities had to meet more stringent financial qualifications than white buyers. (Credit: iStock)

LI agents routinely discriminate against minority buyers, undercover probe finds

Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son (Credit: Getty Images)

SoftBank’s $3B payout to WeWork’s investors is delayed

arrow_forward_ios