In bid for relief, restaurants wage lobbying war against insurers

Eateries pushing for business-interruption claims even if policies exclude pandemics

National /
Apr.April 20, 2020 09:30 AM
Restaurants and insurers fighting a war over whether coronavirus distress should be covered by business interruption insurance. (Photo by Johannes EISELE / AFP) (Photo by JOHANNES EISELE/AFP via Getty Images)

Restaurants and insurers are at war over whether coronavirus distress is covered by business-interruption insurance. (Photo by Johannes EISELE / AFP) (Photo by JOHANNES EISELE/AFP via Getty Images)

Restaurants and the insurance industry are shaping up as two of the biggest rivals in the coronavirus pandemic.

Eateries are pushing Congress and President Donald Trump to cover business-interruption claims that stem from the coronavirus even in cases where their policies exclude losses from pandemics, according to the Wall Street Journal. Insurers do offer coverage in some cases, but not many restaurants carry it. Such policies are generally much more expensive than standard business-interruption claims.

Restaurants are among the businesses hit hardest by the pandemic, and their inability to make rent impacts landlords who have loans to pay. And for many restaurant owners, it’s unclear if small business loans from the government’s $2 trillion stimulus package will cover them until it’s time to re-open.

The Business Interruption Group — the main organization backing restaurants — has launched a campaign pushing insurers to pay claims regardless of whether restaurants have pandemic coverage and pushing the government to reimburse insurers.

But insurers have gained the support of a group of Republican senators, who have urged Trump not to rewrite the country’s insurance policies, as they maintain that doing so would undermine the system.

Insurers argue that having to pay claims for damages excluded from policies would be a disaster and wants the federal government to create a fund that would pay for claims stemming from the pandemic.

In a letter to Rep. Mike Thompson, a group of insurance trade associations wrote, “Mandating coverage for this size and type of exposure while nullifying existing exclusions would amount to an unconstitutional abrogation of insurance contracts and end the very existence of the business-interruption insurance market as we know it.” [WSJ— Eddie Small


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
(Photo Illustration by The Real Deal with Getty Images)
Office occupancy stalls after Labor Day push
Office occupancy stalls after Labor Day push
Mario Carbone and the Palm Island house (Getty Images, Google Maps)
Major Food Group’s Mario Carbone buys Miami Beach home
Major Food Group’s Mario Carbone buys Miami Beach home
Frank Pellegrino Jr. with Loews Miami Beach and Loews Hotel owner Jonathan Tisch (Rao's, Google Maps, Getty)
Iconic NYC eatery Rao’s to open at Loews Miami Beach
Iconic NYC eatery Rao’s to open at Loews Miami Beach
RXR CEO Scott Rechler and 620 Sixth Avenue (Photo Illustration by Steven Dilakian for The Real Deal with Getty Images, Beyond My Ken, CC BY-SA 4.0 - via Wikimedia Commons)
RXR sues insurers over infectious disease coverage
RXR sues insurers over infectious disease coverage
Moderna's Tracey Franklin and St. Regis Residences Boston (Getty, Moderna)
Boston’s luxury boom comes courtesy of Moderna
Boston’s luxury boom comes courtesy of Moderna
NYC outdoor dining being swept up
Billionaires’ Row landlord fed up with outdoor dining
Billionaires’ Row landlord fed up with outdoor dining
New York City Comptroller Brad Lander (Office of New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, iStock)
Office occupancy in New York finally hits 40%
Office occupancy in New York finally hits 40%
(iStock/Illustration by The Real Deal)
Real estate agents landed $3.9B in PPP loans: report
Real estate agents landed $3.9B in PPP loans: report
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...