States look to erase racial covenants from housing deeds

Fine print can include clauses barring minority ownership

National /
Aug.August 18, 2021 10:35 AM
Over the past three years, eight states have enacted laws to make it easier to eliminate racial covenants from housing deeds. (iStock)

Over the past three years, eight states have enacted laws to make it easier to eliminate racial covenants from housing deeds. (iStock)

It’s 2021, but the fine print in some housing deeds still reflects an ugly time when minority homeownership was either explicitly or implicitly forbidden. Now, states are working to make it easier to eliminate those racist relics.

Racial covenants in housing deeds were not uncommon in the 20th century, with language barring ownership for anyone who wasn’t white. Typically it rejected Black buyers. The covenants have not been legal or enforceable for some time, but still remain tucked away in some deeds, the New York Times reported.

Over the past three years, eight states have enacted laws to make it easier to eliminate racial covenants from housing deeds. Bills are pending on the matter in another six states, including New York and California, with the latter proposing to eliminate a $95 fee to erase the covenants from individual deeds.

The covenants became more prominent after the Supreme Court eliminated racial zoning laws in 1917, the Times noted. In place of exclusionary zoning, the covenants were utilized locally to allow segregation to continue — supported by the real estate industry and U.S. government.

The National Association of Real Estate Boards created a model clause for deeds in 1927 promoting more racial covenants. Last year, its successor organization, the National Association of Realtors, formally apologized for past racist actions.

The Federal Housing Administration also looked at racial covenants favorably when deciding when to guarantee loans. The Supreme Court banned the enforcement of racial covenants in 1948 and 20 years later the Fair Housing Act made housing discrimination illegal. Nevertheless, their discriminatory effects persisted for years and localities found other ways to segregate housing.

[NYT] — Holden Walter-Warner





    Related Articles

    arrow_forward_ios
    Silver Lining Ranch in Aspen (Redfin, Illustration by The Real Deal)
    Aspen Mansion sells for a steep $69M
    Aspen Mansion sells for a steep $69M
    145 Reade Street (Illustration by Kevin Cifuentes for The Real Deal with Getty Images, Zillow)
    Real estate investor lists Tribeca townhouse for first time in 20 years
    Real estate investor lists Tribeca townhouse for first time in 20 years
    Corcoran's David Mayer and Compass' Augusto Bittencourt (Corcoran, Compass, Getty)
    Foreign investors shift real estate strategies as dollar strengthens
    Foreign investors shift real estate strategies as dollar strengthens
    Ron Burkle and 704 Broadway (Modlin Group, Hugoatyugo/CC BY-SA 3.0/via Wikimedia Commons)
    Billionaire Ron Burkle selling Noho penthouse
    Billionaire Ron Burkle selling Noho penthouse
    Tim Foley (Anywhere, Getty Images)
    Anywhere Real Estate’s Tim Foley resigns
    Anywhere Real Estate’s Tim Foley resigns
    (Illustration by The Real Deal with Getty)
    Rising mortgage rates lock out homebuyers, trigger layoffs
    Rising mortgage rates lock out homebuyers, trigger layoffs
    United Kingdom Chancellor of the Exchequer Kwasi Kwarteng
    Turmoil hits United Kingdom mortgage market
    Turmoil hits United Kingdom mortgage market
     Lakeland Bank president Thomas Shara (Lakeland Bank, Illustration by The Real Deal with Getty)
    In redlining case, New Jersey lender to pay $12M
    In redlining case, New Jersey lender to pay $12M
    arrow_forward_ios

    The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

    Loading...