$100M moratorium: That’s how much Geoff Palmer’s firms say LA eviction ban has cost them

Multifamily developer’s companies say moratorium violates Constitution’s “takings clause”

Los Angeles /
Aug.August 10, 2021 10:30 AM
Developer Geoff Palmer with one of his properties (Getty, G.H. Palmer Associates)
Developer Geoff Palmer with one of his properties (Getty, G.H. Palmer Associates)

A group of companies owned by multifamily developer Geoff Palmer is suing the city of Los Angeles for $100 million over its eviction moratorium.

The companies claim they have incurred “astronomical” financial losses because of the measure meant to protect tenants hit hard by Covid, according to the Los Angeles Times.

The eviction ban has been in place since the beginning of the pandemic and has also been challenged by the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles, a landlord advocacy group.

Palmer’s companies claim the moratorium violates the Constitution’s “takings clause” in the Fifth Amendment, which says private property cannot “be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

The suit also claims the moratorium “arbitrarily shifts the financial burden” of tenants onto property owners. Because of the moratorium, the suit alleges lenders have refused to refinance loans on properties owned by Palmer’s companies.

L.A. City Attorney Mike Feuer called the moratorium a “lawful ordinance.”

“We defeated a previous attack on these crucial protections and will vigorously defend the ordinance again,” he said, according to the report.

Palmer’s firms argue it’s unlikely they’ll recoup uncollected rent when the moratorium expires. The L.A. moratorium lasts through September, while the CDC’s targeted ban lasts through Oct. 3.

It’s unclear whether Palmer’s companies are eligible to receive rental assistance from the city or state. California set aside $5.2 billion in its budget for rental assistance.

Both programs specifically target low-income renters. Palmer successfully sued the city in 2007 over its affordable housing requirement, winning the right to exclude affordable units from one of his buildings.

[LAT] — Dennis Lynch 





    Related Articles

    arrow_forward_ios
    Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger (Supervisor Kathryn Barger, Getty Images)
    L.A. County to end pandemic tenant protections – for good
    L.A. County to end pandemic tenant protections – for good
    View of Sylmar Village at 12534 San Fernando Road (JZA)
    Sylmar project aims for 100% affordable market
    Sylmar project aims for 100% affordable market
    Stockbridge Chiefs Terry Fancher and Sol Raso with The Bahay
    Stockbridge Capital pays nearly $138M for Filipinotown apartments
    Stockbridge Capital pays nearly $138M for Filipinotown apartments
    CIM Group’s Shaul Kuba with renderings of the project at 6007 Sunset Blvd in Hollywood (Cim Group, Getty)
    CIM clears hurdle toward building 109-unit complex in Hollywood
    CIM clears hurdle toward building 109-unit complex in Hollywood
    Legacy Partners' W. Dean Henry with The Verandas (Legacy Partners, The Verandas Apartments)
    Legacy Partners unloads 209-unit apartment complex in West Covina for $92M
    Legacy Partners unloads 209-unit apartment complex in West Covina for $92M
    11677 - 11683 Goshen Avenue (Redfin)
    Brentwood apartment building finds a buyer
    Brentwood apartment building finds a buyer
    Kacy Keys and the proposed site on the corner of Crenshaw Boulevard and West 54th Street (Loopnet, Praxis Development Group)
    Praxis Development proposes 48-unit apartment building in Crenshaw district
    Praxis Development proposes 48-unit apartment building in Crenshaw district
    (iStock)
    Interest rate hikes clog LA multifamily pipeline
    Interest rate hikes clog LA multifamily pipeline
    arrow_forward_ios

    The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

    Loading...