Warehouse “buffer bill” advances

Legislation hints at bigger development conflict in Inland Empire’s hot logistics market

Los Angeles /
Jun.June 02, 2022 08:30 AM
Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes (California State Assembly, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, iStock)
Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes (California State Assembly, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, iStock)

A bill that would create a 1,000-foot buffer zone between large warehouse developments and residential areas has advanced through one chamber of the California legislature. 

The measure, known as Assembly Bill 2840, passed a third and final reading in the 80-member California Assembly last week. It is now in the State Senate.  

“You can be a neighbor, but we want you to be a good neighbor,” Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes, who represents an Inland Empire district and introduced the bill, previously told the Riverside Press-Enterprise, referring to logistics companies. “It isn’t being a good neighbor if you’re driving your diesel trucks through neighborhoods where these children are.”

Gómez Reyes’ office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The bill, introduced by Gómez Reyes in February, creates the buffer zone by prohibiting local agencies from approving the development of facilities that are 100,000 square feet or larger if they’re located within 1,000 feet of any “sensitive receptor” — a broad term that includes homes and apartments, schools, community centers and prisons. A revised version also allows local agencies to approve the projects but impose “alternative measures that will reduce the project’s impact on the public health and safety in a comparable manner.”

It also requires that local agencies mandate that a percentage of the construction jobs on logistics projects go to local residents, and that the work is done only by a “skilled and trained” workforce–language that suggests a preference for union members.

The legislation is intended as an effort to curb transportation and industrial-related health risks. In her bill comments, Gómez Reyes, a Democrat from Colton — an Inland Empire city that’s located at the intersection of two major freeways — specifically cites constant emissions from diesel truck traffic as a risk to schools and communities.

The California Nurses Association is also backing the effort, again citing the high levels of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide pollution.

“These pollution-producing warehouses,” the group added, “are disproportionately located in low-income and minority neighborhoods.”

The effort has proved controversial, drawing opposition from the California Chamber of Commerce and other business groups who argue that stifling new warehouses would hurt the state’s supply chain. Some Democratic lawmakers have weighed in against the effort, and on Wednesday the Los Angeles Daily News’ editorial board also came out in opposition, writing in part that “the end result of this policy … is to restrict needed space to accommodate an ever-shifting market.”

The bill also reflects the booming industrial and logistics market of the Inland Empire––which includes Riverside and San Bernardino counties––which ranks among the largest and hottest in the country.

It’s a market that started growing decades ago, largely because of the area’s strategic location and relatively cheap land. The trend has accelerated over the past two decades, as e-commerce giants such as Amazon reshaped the American economy: As of 2021, according to a compilation by a Pitzer College environmental professor, San Bernardino County had over 3,000 warehouses and Riverside County nearly 1,000. Those facilities totalled more than one billion square feet, or nearly 37 square miles, and are a big part of the reason why 40 percent of the nation’s goods travel through the Inland Empire.

The pandemic supercharged the already hot submarket: A report published in April by Newmark found that industrial space in the two-county region was virtually nonexistent, pushing lease prices to their highest levels ever, while industrial developers were also rushing to build more than 33 million square feet of industrial space. In recent months the market has also notched some nationally high-profile deals, including Amazon’s lease of a 4.1 million-square-foot facility in Ontario — the company’s largest ever.

“It looks like the Inland Empire is about to eat up the rest of Southern California,” one economist recently told the Southern California News Group.

At the same time, however, residents and local governments — concerned especially about the area’s poor air quality — have increasingly pushed back against the warehouse boom: Numerous area cities, including Riverside, San Bernardino and Colton–hometown of Reyes, author of the state legislation––have moved to pass their own local moratoriums on new warehouses.





    Related Articles

    arrow_forward_ios
    Prologis' Hamid Moghadam and 8819 E Edison Ave in Ontario (Google Maps, Prologis)
    Prologis gets option on 177 more acres in Ontario Ranch
    Prologis gets option on 177 more acres in Ontario Ranch
    Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes (47th Assembly District, iStock)
    Inland Empire industrial developers dodge a bullet — for now
    Inland Empire industrial developers dodge a bullet — for now
    Crow Holdings CEO Bob McLain and 2524 S Lilac Avenue (LinkedIn, Google Maps)
    Dallas outfit spends $72M on industrial in Inland Empire
    Dallas outfit spends $72M on industrial in Inland Empire
    Bruce’s Beach, LA County
    LA County returns Bruce’s Beach to descendants of Black owners
    LA County returns Bruce’s Beach to descendants of Black owners
    Amazon's Jeff Bezos and the vacant land near Palm Springs (Getty, Google Maps)
    Amazon buys 120 acres set for 3.4M sf distribution hub
    Amazon buys 120 acres set for 3.4M sf distribution hub
    19401 South Vermont Avenue in Torrance (Loopnet, iStock)
    Atlas Capital buys Torrance flex office campus
    Atlas Capital buys Torrance flex office campus
    Clear Capital LLC founding partners (L-R) Daniel Hardy, Eric Sussman, Paul Pellizzon and Greg Worchell with Foothill Ridge apartments, 1334 W. Foothill Blvd., Upland (Clear Capital LLC, Foothill Ridge Apts.)
    Clear Capital buys 232-unit apartment complex in Inland Empire
    Clear Capital buys 232-unit apartment complex in Inland Empire
    Rexford Industrial Realty's Michael Frankel, Howard Schwimmer and 29125 Avenue Paine (Loopnet, iStock, Rexford Industrial Realty)
    Rexford bypasses rate hike on $218M spree of deals
    Rexford bypasses rate hike on $218M spree of deals
    arrow_forward_ios

    The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

    Loading...