New legislation on Capitol Hill seeks to curb an increasingly popular mortgage concept: Providing home loans to applicants using their Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, in lieu of a Social Security number.
ITINs are issued by the Internal Revenue Service to assist immigrant workers who do not qualify for a Social Security number — but do have taxable income — to report their income and pay federal taxes.
Dozens of banks around the country have begun offering home mortgages to undocumented immigrants using ITINs, but their programs generally have been low-key and small in volume. Bank of America stirred controversy in February when it announced a pilot program in Los Angeles to provide credit cards to resident alien customers who lack Social Security numbers but have ITINs.
Some critics charged that the bank was seeking to profit by helping illegal immigrants who should be deported or prosecuted, not extended consumer credit. Bank of America said its program is legal, and may be rolled out nationwide if the pilot is successful.
Now a bill has been introduced in Congress that would prohibit financial institutions from providing home mortgages to anyone who lacks a Social Security number. The bill (H.R. 480), introduced by Rep. John T. Doolittle, R-Calif., would amend the Truth in Lending Act to make ITIN mortgage lending illegal.
Doolittle’s office released a statement that said, in part, “The government should not be in the business of creating incentives to encourage illegal behavior. Nor should companies be permitted to reward those individuals in clear violation of our laws.”
Proponents of ITIN-based lending to home buyers say Doolittle has it all wrong. Tim Sandos, president and CEO of the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals, said Doolittle’s bill would be “extremely disruptive,” and affect far more people than the illegal immigrants the measure purports to target.
Sandos estimates that there are as many as 7 to 8 million resident aliens in the United States who do not have Social Security cards but are in some phase of the immigration process leading to citizenship.
That process can take years — often more than eight years — and, “meanwhile these individuals are working here, earning incomes, paying taxes, contributing to the economy.”
They “are not illegal,” said Sandos, “they are undocumented. The government knows exactly who they are and where they are.” Doolittle’s bill, he added, “is the equivalent of trying to drive a tack with a sledgehammer.” Sandos’ group, which is comprised of Latino and non-Latino representatives of banks, real estate firms, developers, home builders and real estate service providers, conducted a study that concluded that if mortgage companies made greater use of ITINs to extend home loans to qualified buyers, $44 billion in new mortgages — primarily to first-time buyers — could be originated.
Geoffrey F. Cooper, director of emerging markets for MGIC Investment Corp., a major private mortgage insurance firm, said lenders in roughly 40 states are already making mortgages to customers using ITINs. MGIC’s role is to provide insurance against losses to lenders in the event borrowers default or go to foreclosure.
Cooper said his company’s program was initiated at the request of community banks and other local lending institutions that found that many of their customers who lacked Social Security numbers — but had ITINs for tax purposes — earned solid incomes, had stable employment histories and excellent payment histories on debt obligations.
Under MGIC’s program, underwriting standards are strict, with mandatory documentation of income, assets, residency and other criteria — stricter standards, in fact, than many lenders impose on applicants who have Social Security cards.
Home buyers with ITIN mortgages “perform like ‘A’ credit borrowers,” said Cooper, and they qualify for MGIC’s favorable ‘A-premium’ insurance rates because they are so dependable.
Janis Bowdler, senior housing policy analyst for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy group, said the home buyers who use ITIN mortgages should be seen simply as “hardworking, taxpaying families who want to participate in the American dream,” even if they do not yet have Social Security numbers because of their immigration status.
Sandos noted that making Social Security numbers mandatory to obtain a mortgage also could affect the ability of Asian, European, South American and other foreign investors who simply want to buy a house or condo in the United States for periodic visits, but not full-time residency. That, in turn, could prompt foreign governments to impose restrictions on the ability of American citizens to buy real estate abroad.
Ken Harney is a real estate columnist with the Washington Post.